Merrimack County v. Hillsborough County

118 A. 813, 80 N.H. 387, 1922 N.H. LEXIS 34
CourtSupreme Court of New Hampshire
DecidedMay 2, 1922
StatusPublished

This text of 118 A. 813 (Merrimack County v. Hillsborough County) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Hampshire primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Merrimack County v. Hillsborough County, 118 A. 813, 80 N.H. 387, 1922 N.H. LEXIS 34 (N.H. 1922).

Opinion

Young, J.

Merrimack is the county in which the pauper had last resided for one year, in the last five, at the time she applied to it for relief; consequently it was chargeable with her support notwithstanding she had been aided by Hillsborough county within a year; for she had not resided in that county for three months at the time the relief was furnished. P. S., c. 85, s. 9, as amended by Laws 1903, c. 67, s. 3.

*388 In'other words, as Hillsborough county, might have recovered from Merrimack county the money it gave the pauper, she had not been aided' by'that county within one year, within the meaning, of. that term as used in s.- 9, when she applied to Merrimack county for relief.

Petition dismissecL

A1Í concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
118 A. 813, 80 N.H. 387, 1922 N.H. LEXIS 34, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/merrimack-county-v-hillsborough-county-nh-1922.