Merrils v. Goodwin

1 Root 209
Connecticut Superior Court·Decided August 15, 1790·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

By the Court.

A man’s finding bees in a tree standing upon another man’s land, gives him no right either to the tree or the bees; and a swarm of bees going from a hive, if they can be followed and known, are not lost to tbe owner, but may be reclaimed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Merrils v. Goodwin, 1 Root 209 (Colo. Ct. App. 1790).

1 Root 209 (Merrils v. Goodwin) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Smith v. Lenoci, No. Cv93 45 51 30 S (Jan. 25, 1994)
1994 Conn. Super. Ct. 898 (Connecticut Superior Court, 1994)
State v. Repp
40 L.R.A. 687 (Supreme Court of Iowa, 1898)
Rexroth v. Coon
23 A. 37 (Supreme Court of Rhode Island, 1885)
Fisher v. Steward
1 Smith & H. 60 (Superior Court of New Hampshire, 1804)