Merrils v. Goodwin

1 Root 209
CourtConnecticut Superior Court
DecidedAugust 15, 1790
StatusPublished
Cited by4 cases

This text of 1 Root 209 (Merrils v. Goodwin) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Connecticut Superior Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Merrils v. Goodwin, 1 Root 209 (Colo. Ct. App. 1790).

Opinion

By the Court.

A man’s finding bees in a tree standing upon another man’s land, gives him no right either to the tree or the bees; and a swarm of bees going from a hive, if they can be followed and known, are not lost to tbe owner, but may be reclaimed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Smith v. Lenoci, No. Cv93 45 51 30 S (Jan. 25, 1994)
1994 Conn. Super. Ct. 898 (Connecticut Superior Court, 1994)
State v. Repp
40 L.R.A. 687 (Supreme Court of Iowa, 1898)
Rexroth v. Coon
23 A. 37 (Supreme Court of Rhode Island, 1885)
Fisher v. Steward
1 Smith & H. 60 (Superior Court of New Hampshire, 1804)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
1 Root 209, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/merrils-v-goodwin-connsuperct-1790.