Merrill v. Tyler

1 Seld. Notes 83
CourtNew York Court of Appeals
DecidedApril 12, 1853
StatusPublished

This text of 1 Seld. Notes 83 (Merrill v. Tyler) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Merrill v. Tyler, 1 Seld. Notes 83 (N.Y. 1853).

Opinion

The acts or declarations of a party bind him by way of estoppel, only to the extent that they have been acted upon by the party setting up the estoppel.

[84]*84Where a party received a promissory note to which the name of the defendant as maker had been forged, and advanced half the amount of it before it was presented to the defendant, it was then presented to him, and he made such statements as to induce the holder to advance the residue of the note,— Held, that the defendant was estopped from showing the forgery only to the extent of the advances made on the faith of his statements, which was all that could be recovered, the forgery being established.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
1 Seld. Notes 83, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/merrill-v-tyler-ny-1853.