Merrill v. Sanborn

2 N.H. 499
Superior Court of New Hampshire·Decided September 15, 1822·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

By the court.

The question in this case is, whether the testator omitted the mention of Mrs, Merrill in his will by-design, or through forgetfulness and mistake? She was one of seven grand-children, the children of the testator’s only son. The testator mentions two of her brothers ami her father ; on what ground are we to presume that the testator omitted the other five children of his only son through forgetfulness ? We are of opinion, that there is no ground for such a presumption. It is incredible that he should have passed over five out of seven grand-children through forget[501]*501fulness. The case of Wilder vs. Goss. (14 Mass. Rep. 357,) is directly in point. 1 Mass. Rep. 146.—2 ditto 570.—3 ditto 17.

Judgment for the tenants.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Merrill v. Sanborn, 2 N.H. 499 (N.H. Super. Ct. 1822).

2 N.H. 499 (Merrill v. Sanborn) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

In re Estate of Osgood
453 A.2d 838 (Supreme Court of New Hampshire, 1982)
Gage v. Gage
29 N.H. 533 (Superior Court of New Hampshire, 1854)