Merrill v. Nrt New England, Inc.

15 A.3d 629, 300 Conn. 925, 2011 Conn. LEXIS 120
CourtSupreme Court of Connecticut
DecidedMarch 23, 2011
DocketSC 18763
StatusPublished

This text of 15 A.3d 629 (Merrill v. Nrt New England, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Connecticut primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Merrill v. Nrt New England, Inc., 15 A.3d 629, 300 Conn. 925, 2011 Conn. LEXIS 120 (Colo. 2011).

Opinion

The defendants’ petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 126 Conn. App. 314 (AC 30972), is granted, limited to the following issues:

[926]*926The Supreme Court docket number is SC 18763. Thomas E. Crosby, in support of the petition. Decided March 23, 2011
“1. Did the Appellate Court properly determine that General Statutes §§ 52-72 and 52-46a did not deprive the court of subject matter jurisdiction?
“2. Did the Appellate Court properly determine that the defendants waived any challenge to a lack of in personam jurisdiction?”

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Merrill v. NRT New England, Inc.
12 A.3d 575 (Connecticut Appellate Court, 2011)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
15 A.3d 629, 300 Conn. 925, 2011 Conn. LEXIS 120, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/merrill-v-nrt-new-england-inc-conn-2011.