Merrill v. . McMinn
29 N.C. 344
Opinion
It is very certain that the objection would have been held good had it not been for the act of the General Assembly at its Session of 1844-5, curing defects in the official bonds of certain officers therein named. The circumstance that the constable's bond was taken by a court composed of only three magistrates makes no difference, since the passage of the aforesaid act of Assembly. S. v. Pool,
PER CURIAM. Judgment affirmed.
Cited: Comrs. v. Magnin,
(346)
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Merrill v. . McMinn, 29 N.C. 344 (N.C. 1847).
29 N.C. 344 (Merrill v. . McMinn) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Commissioners of Wake County v. Magnin
86 N.C. 285 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1882)
State Ex Rel. Jordan v. Pool
27 N.C. 105 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1844)