Merrill v. . McMinn

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Merrill v. . McMinn

29 N.C. 344

DecidedAugust 5, 1847

StatusPublished

This text of 29 N.C. 344 (Merrill v. . McMinn) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Merrill v. . McMinn, 29 N.C. 344 (N.C. 1847).

Pincite

Opinion

It is very certain that the objection would have been held good had it not been for the act of the General Assembly at its Session of 1844-5, curing defects in the official bonds of certain officers therein named. The circumstance that the constable's bond was taken by a court composed of only three magistrates makes no difference, since the passage of the aforesaid act of Assembly. S. v. Pool, 27 N.C. 105.

PER CURIAM. Judgment affirmed.

Cited: Comrs. v. Magnin, 86 N.C. 289. *Page 243

(346)

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

It is very certain that the objection would have been held good had it not been for the act of the General Assembly at its Session of 1844-5, curing defects in the official bonds of certain officers therein named. The circumstance that the constable's bond was taken by a court composed of only three magistrates makes no difference, since the passage of the aforesaid act of Assembly. S. v. Pool, 27 N.C. 105.

PER CURIAM. Judgment affirmed.

Cited: Comrs. v. Magnin, 86 N.C. 289. *Page 243

(346)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

29 N.C. 344, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/merrill-v-mcminn-nc-1847.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack