Merrill v. Cavagnaro

34 P.2d 179, 139 Cal. App. 454, 1934 Cal. App. LEXIS 500
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Merrill v. Cavagnaro. Read the opinion of the Court — 136 Cal. App. 263
California Court of Appeal·Decided June 29, 1934·No. Civ. No. 9136·Published

Opinion

TYLER, P. J.

Motion for order recalling and correcting remittitur so as to include costs on appeal. The motion is based upon the contention that the judgment entered herein modified the judgment appealed from but contained no directions as to costs on appeal, and the clerk omitted to enter upon the record and insert in the remittitur a judgment that appellant recover costs.

The judgment appealed from was not reversed nor modified but simply contained a direction that upon final distribution the amount paid by the executor on account of inheritance taxes should be charged against the shares of the legatees on which the taxes were based. The direction is in no sense a reversal or modification and was not intended to be so understood. Respondent therefore is entitled to costs.

The motion is denied.

Knight, J., and Cashin, J., concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Merrill v. Cavagnaro, 34 P.2d 179, 139 Cal. App. 454, 1934 Cal. App. LEXIS 500 (Cal. Ct. App. 1934).

34 P.2d 179 (Merrill v. Cavagnaro) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.