Merrill v. Bickford

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Merrill v. Bickford

65 Me. 118, 1876 Me. LEXIS 24

CourtSupreme Judicial Court of Maine

DecidedApril 11, 1876

StatusPublished

Cited by8 cases

This text of 65 Me. 118 (Merrill v. Bickford) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Judicial Court of Maine primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Merrill v. Bickford, 65 Me. 118, 1876 Me. LEXIS 24 (Me. 1876).

Pincite

Opinion

Walton, J.

The will of Judith W. Edgecomb, among other bequests and devises, contains the following :

“Twelfth. I give and bequeath to W. F. Bickford a lot of land known as the Coleman lot, and being the same I purchased of Thos. E. Fox; also four oxen and two cows, the same now on the farm ; and said Bickford shall pay or cause to be paid to Thos. IT. Merrill, my brother, the sum of sixty dollars per year during the natural lives of said Thos. II. Merrill and his present wife.”

I. Was this annuity a charge upon the land therein devised? We think it was. When the same sentence or clause by which land is devised imposes upon the devisee the duty of paying an annuity, or other sum of money, and no other fund is provided, out of which the payment is to be made, such annuity or legacy is a charge upon the land; and if the devisee accepts it, he takes it subject to such charge.

II. This annuity was to continue “during the natural lives of said Thos. II. Merrill and his wife.” Would it cease upon the death of one of them? Wo think not. We think the annuity is payable so long as either lives. Douglas v. Parsons, 22 Ohio St. B., 526.

III. Thos. H. Merrill is dead. His widow still lives. Is she entitled to the annuity? We feel compelled, very reluctantly, to answer this question in the negative. It was made payable to Thos II. Merrill, and, although its payment survives, there is nothing to indicate an intention on the part of the testatrix that it should, in any event, or at any time, be payable to the widow. It will therefore be assets in the hands of the administrator of Thos. 11. Merrill, and can only be given to the widow by a decree of the judge of probate. This suit not being prosecnted by the proper party, the decree prayed for cannot be made, and the bill must be dismissed. Dill dismissed.

No cost for either party.

Appleton, C. J., Barrows, Danforth, Yirgin and Peters, JJ., concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Walton, J.

The will of Judith W. Edgecomb, among other bequests and devises, contains the following :

“Twelfth. I give and bequeath to W. F. Bickford a lot of land known as the Coleman lot, and being the same I purchased of Thos. E. Fox; also four oxen and two cows, the same now on the farm ; and said Bickford shall pay or cause to be paid to Thos. IT. Merrill, my brother, the sum of sixty dollars per year during the natural lives of said Thos. II. Merrill and his present wife.”

I. Was this annuity a charge upon the land therein devised? We think it was. When the same sentence or clause by which land is devised imposes upon the devisee the duty of paying an annuity, or other sum of money, and no other fund is provided, out of which the payment is to be made, such annuity or legacy is a charge upon the land; and if the devisee accepts it, he takes it subject to such charge.

II. This annuity was to continue “during the natural lives of said Thos. II. Merrill and his wife.” Would it cease upon the death of one of them? Wo think not. We think the annuity is payable so long as either lives. Douglas v. Parsons, 22 Ohio St. B., 526.

III. Thos. H. Merrill is dead. His widow still lives. Is she entitled to the annuity? We feel compelled, very reluctantly, to answer this question in the negative. It was made payable to Thos II. Merrill, and, although its payment survives, there is nothing to indicate an intention on the part of the testatrix that it should, in any event, or at any time, be payable to the widow. It will therefore be assets in the hands of the administrator of Thos. 11. Merrill, and can only be given to the widow by a decree of the judge of probate. This suit not being prosecnted by the proper party, the decree prayed for cannot be made, and the bill must be dismissed. Dill dismissed.

No cost for either party.

Appleton, C. J., Barrows, Danforth, Yirgin and Peters, JJ., concurred.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

65 Me. 118, 1876 Me. LEXIS 24, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/merrill-v-bickford-me-1876.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack