Merrill Preston Harris v. Louis L. Wainwright, Director Division of Corrections, State of Florida

368 F.2d 840
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided November 21, 1966·No. 23779·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

On conflicting testimony the district court, in a hearing upon a petition for habeas corpus seeking relief from a state court conviction, held that there was no denial of any Constitutional right of the appellant. The Escobedo [Escobedo v. People of State of Illinois, 378 U.S. 478, 84 S.Ct. 1758, 12 L.Ed.2d 977] and Miranda [Miranda v. State of Arizona, 384 U.S. 436, 86 S.Ct. 1602, 16 L.Ed.2d 694] doctrines were invoked. The trial commenced prior to the Escobedo decision and hence the principles announced there and in Miranda are inapplicable. The order of the district court is

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Merrill Preston Harris v. Louis L. Wainwright, Director Division of Corrections, State of Florida, 368 F.2d 840 (5th Cir. 1966).

368 F.2d 840 (Merrill Preston Harris v. Louis L. Wainwright, Director Division of Corrections, State of Florida) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Escobedo v. Illinois
378 U.S. 478 (Supreme Court, 1964)
Miranda v. Arizona
384 U.S. 436 (Supreme Court, 1966)