Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc. v. G. C. Haas & Co.

235 N.E.2d 919, 21 N.Y.2d 835, 288 N.Y.S.2d 918, 1968 N.Y. LEXIS 1604
CourtNew York Court of Appeals
DecidedFebruary 21, 1968
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 235 N.E.2d 919 (Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc. v. G. C. Haas & Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc. v. G. C. Haas & Co., 235 N.E.2d 919, 21 N.Y.2d 835, 288 N.Y.S.2d 918, 1968 N.Y. LEXIS 1604 (N.Y. 1968).

Opinion

Motion to dismiss appeal granted and appeal dismissed, with costs and $10 costs of motion, upon the ground that no substantial constitutional question is directly involved.

Cross motion for leave to appeal dismissed with leave to renew upon proper papers within 30 days after entry of the present order dismissing the appeal (CPLR 5513, subd. [c]; 5514, subd. [a]).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Brown v. Gilligan, Will & Co.
287 F. Supp. 766 (S.D. New York, 1968)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
235 N.E.2d 919, 21 N.Y.2d 835, 288 N.Y.S.2d 918, 1968 N.Y. LEXIS 1604, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/merrill-lynch-pierce-fenner-smith-inc-v-g-c-haas-co-ny-1968.