Merril Leroy Jessop v. State
This text of Merril Leroy Jessop v. State (Merril Leroy Jessop v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
PER CURIAM
Appellant Merril Leroy Jessop filed a pro se notice of appeal following his conviction for sexual assault. We are advised in a motion to abate filed by Daniel W. Hurley on appellant's behalf that following a hearing on May 13, 2010, the trial court overruled motions for a free record and appointed counsel on appeal. Hurley states that he is, in effect, representing appellant on a pro bono basis. Hurley asks the Court to abate the appeal from the judgment of conviction pending the resolution of the question of appellant's indigence.
The motion to abate is granted in part. If it has not already done so, the district court shall order the preparation and filing at no cost to appellant of a reporter's record from the indigency hearing. See Snoke v. State, 717 S.W.2d 5, 7 (Tex. Crim. App. 1986). The court shall also order the preparation of a clerk's record that is at least adequate to appeal the indigency issue. Subject to further extension of time for good cause shown, these records should be tendered for filing no later than September 17, 2010. After the appellate record is filed, the parties shall file briefs addressing the propriety of the trial court's determination that appellant is not indigent.
Before Chief Justice Jones, Justices Puryear and Pemberton
Abated
Filed: August 20, 2010
Do Not Publish
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Merril Leroy Jessop v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/merril-leroy-jessop-v-state-texapp-2010.