Merrick v. Township Board

2 N.W. 922, 41 Mich. 630, 1879 Mich. LEXIS 913
CourtMichigan Supreme Court
DecidedOctober 14, 1879
StatusPublished
Cited by11 cases

This text of 2 N.W. 922 (Merrick v. Township Board) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Merrick v. Township Board, 2 N.W. 922, 41 Mich. 630, 1879 Mich. LEXIS 913 (Mich. 1879).

Opinion

Marston, J.

The township board claiming to act under § 3695 of the Compiled Laws removed the plaintiff in error from the office of assessor of a certain school district in said township. The proceedings were removed to the circuit court for review, by writ of certiorari, and on the hearing the writ was quashed for want of jurisdiction. The case comes here on writ of error.

It is urged by the defendant in error that the jurisdiction to issue a common law writ of certiorari is lodged exclusively by the Constitution and law in this court, and that the power of the circuit court to issue such a writ is restricted to such courts and tribunals as are mentioned in section one of the judicial article of the Constitution, which would not include a case like the present.

The Constitution clearly gives the circuit courts power to issue the writ in cases like the present, and section 7132 of the Compiled Laws does not deprive the circuit courts of the jurisdiction given them by the Constitution.

That the Constitution gives this power to the circuit court was held in Thompson v. School District, 25 Mich., 484, and has never been questioned. See also Taylor v. Judge of St. Clair Circuit, 32 Mich., 95; McBride v. Common Council, 32 Mich., 360.

This case is governed by the decisions referred to. The town board was acting in a quasi judicial capacity, and as such must be considered as an inferior tribunal over which the circuit court is given a general control by the constitution.

It was not claimed, and indeed could not be, that the action of the town board could be sustained. It fol-lows that the judgment of the circuit court in dismissing the writ of certiorari and the proceedings of the town board must be reversed with costs to plaintiff in error.

The other Justices concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Russ v. Board of Education of Brunswick County
59 S.E.2d 589 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1950)
State Ex Rel. Gallagher v. Kansas City
7 S.W.2d 357 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1928)
State ex rel. Brewster v. Mohler
158 P. 408 (Supreme Court of Kansas, 1916)
Powell v. Bullis
77 N.E. 575 (Illinois Supreme Court, 1906)
City of Chicago v. Bullis
124 Ill. App. 7 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 1905)
Matter of Carter
74 P. 997 (California Supreme Court, 1903)
Pine Bluff Water & Light Co. v. City of Pine Bluff
35 S.W. 227 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 1896)
Gilbert v. Board of Police & Fire Commissioners
40 P. 264 (Utah Supreme Court, 1895)
Comrs. of Mason v. Griffin
134 Ill. 330 (Illinois Supreme Court, 1890)
Zook v. Blough
4 N.W. 219 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1880)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2 N.W. 922, 41 Mich. 630, 1879 Mich. LEXIS 913, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/merrick-v-township-board-mich-1879.