Merrick v. Ramos
Opinion
WO 2 3 6 7\| JD Merrick, No. CV-19-00474-TUC-DCB 8 Plaintiff, ORDER 9 V. Miguel Ramos, et al., Defendants. 12 13 The Court having considered the parties’ Stipulation for Dismissal with Prejudice, and good cause appearing, 15 Accordingly, 16 IT IS ORDERED granting the parties’ Stipulation for Dismissal (Doc. 66), with 17 the parties to bear their own fees and costs. 18 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Court shall retain jurisdiction to enforce the 19 parties’ settlement agreement (Stipulation of Dismissal, Exhibit A (Doc. 66-1), which is 20 incorporated into the Court’s dismissal order. See Kelly v. Wengler, 822 F.3d 1085, 1094 (9th Cir. 2016). 92 Dated this 6th day of July, 2021. 23 S= 26 Honorabje David C. But 27 United States-District Judge 28
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Merrick v. Ramos (Merrick v. Ramos) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.