Merrick v. Ramos
Opinion
WO 2 3 6 7\| JD Merrick, No. CV-19-00474-TUC-DCB 8 Plaintiff, ORDER 9 V. Miguel Ramos, et al., Defendants. 12 13 The Court having considered the parties’ Stipulation for Dismissal with Prejudice, || and good cause appearing, 15 Accordingly, 16 IT IS ORDERED granting the parties’ Stipulation for Dismissal (Doc. 66), with 17 || the parties to bear their own fees and costs. 18 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Court shall retain jurisdiction to enforce the 19 || parties’ settlement agreement (Stipulation of Dismissal, Exhibit A (Doc. 66-1), which is 20 || incorporated into the Court’s dismissal order. See Kelly v. Wengler, 822 F.3d 1085, 1094 || (9th Cir. 2016). 92 Dated this 6th day of July, 2021. 23 S= 26 Honorabje David C. But 27 United States-District Judge 28
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Merrick v. Ramos (Merrick v. Ramos) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.