Merrick v. Merrick

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Merrick v. Merrick

63 A.D.2d 887, 406 N.Y.S.2d 685, 1978 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11881

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJune 6, 1978

StatusPublished

This text of 63 A.D.2d 887 (Merrick v. Merrick) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Merrick v. Merrick, 63 A.D.2d 887, 406 N.Y.S.2d 685, 1978 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11881 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1978).

Pincite

Opinion

Order, Family Court, New York County, entered December 28, "1977 directing appellant to pay support to petitioner pursuant to article 5 of the Family Court Act, unanimously modified, on the law, on the facts and in the exercise of discretion, only to the extent of reducing to $350 the weekly sum to be paid to petitioner for the care and support of the child of the parties, in addition to the direct payment of educational expenses, medical costs, clothing and shoe expenses, reducing the counsel fee awarded to petitioner’s attorney to $10,000, such fee to cover all services rendered to date, inclusive of the appeal, and otherwise affirmed, without costs or disbursements. We consider the amounts awarded to be excessive to the extent indicated. Concur—Silverman, J. P., Fein, Lane, Yesawich and Sandler, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order, Family Court, New York County, entered December 28, "1977 directing appellant to pay support to petitioner pursuant to article 5 of the Family Court Act, unanimously modified, on the law, on the facts and in the exercise of discretion, only to the extent of reducing to $350 the weekly sum to be paid to petitioner for the care and support of the child of the parties, in addition to the direct payment of educational expenses, medical costs, clothing and shoe expenses, reducing the counsel fee awarded to petitioner’s attorney to $10,000, such fee to cover all services rendered to date, inclusive of the appeal, and otherwise affirmed, without costs or disbursements. We consider the amounts awarded to be excessive to the extent indicated. Concur—Silverman, J. P., Fein, Lane, Yesawich and Sandler, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

63 A.D.2d 887, 406 N.Y.S.2d 685, 1978 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11881, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/merrick-v-merrick-nyappdiv-1978.