Merriam & Millard Co. v. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad
268 U.S. 682, 45 S. Ct. 640
This text of 268 U.S. 682 (Merriam & Millard Co. v. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Merriam & Millard Co. v. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad, 268 U.S. 682, 45 S. Ct. 640 (1925).
Opinion
Dismissed for want of jurisdiction upon the authority of Baker v. White, 92 U. S. 176, 179; United States v. Beatty, 232 U. S. 463, 466; Collins v. Miller, 252 U. S. 364, 370.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Baker v. White
92 U.S. 176 (Supreme Court, 1876)
United States v. Beatty
232 U.S. 463 (Supreme Court, 1914)
Collins v. Miller
252 U.S. 364 (Supreme Court, 1920)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
268 U.S. 682, 45 S. Ct. 640, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/merriam-millard-co-v-chicago-burlington-quincy-railroad-scotus-1925.