Merrell v. State

114 S.E. 924, 29 Ga. App. 271, 1922 Ga. App. LEXIS 236
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedDecember 12, 1922
Docket13856
StatusPublished

This text of 114 S.E. 924 (Merrell v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Merrell v. State, 114 S.E. 924, 29 Ga. App. 271, 1922 Ga. App. LEXIS 236 (Ga. Ct. App. 1922).

Opinion

Luke, J.

The evidence fully authorized, if indeed it did not demand, the conviction of the defendant. The special grounds of the amended motion are without merit. The trial court having approved the verdict of guilty, it was not error for any reason assigned to overrule the motion for a new trial.

Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, O. J., and Bloodioorth, J., ooneur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
114 S.E. 924, 29 Ga. App. 271, 1922 Ga. App. LEXIS 236, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/merrell-v-state-gactapp-1922.