Merrell v. Southbound Railway Co.
162 S.E. 922, 202 N.C. 825, 1932 N.C. LEXIS 243
Opinion
The case was properly nonsuited on authority of Davis v. R. R., 187 N. C., 147, 120 S. E., 827, and Exum v. R. R., 154 N. C., 408, 70 S. E., 845, as the facts bring it within the principles there announced.
It would serve no useful purpose to set out the evidence in detail, as the principal question presented is its sufficiency to carry the case to the jury, and we agree with the trial court that it is wanting in the requisite probative value to warrant a recovery for the plaintiff.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Merrell v. Southbound Railway Co., 162 S.E. 922, 202 N.C. 825, 1932 N.C. LEXIS 243 (N.C. 1932).
162 S.E. 922 (Merrell v. Southbound Railway Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Exum v. . R. R.
70 S.E. 845 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1911)
Davis v. . R. R.
120 S.E. 827 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1924)