Merrell v. Southbound Railway Co.
This text of 162 S.E. 922 (Merrell v. Southbound Railway Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The case was properly nonsuited on authority of Davis v. R. R., 187 N. C., 147, 120 S. E., 827, and Exum v. R. R., 154 N. C., 408, 70 S. E., 845, as the facts bring it within the principles there announced.
It would serve no useful purpose to set out the evidence in detail, as the principal question presented is its sufficiency to carry the case to the jury, and we agree with the trial court that it is wanting in the requisite probative value to warrant a recovery for the plaintiff.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
162 S.E. 922, 202 N.C. 825, 1932 N.C. LEXIS 243, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/merrell-v-southbound-railway-co-nc-1932.