Merrell v. Singletary
This text of 736 So. 2d 730 (Merrell v. Singletary) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Gary Oble Merrell petitions for a belated appeal. He alleged that after an evidentiary hearing on a motion for post-conviction relief under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850, he requested, and his privately-retained trial counsel agreed, to take an appeal. No appeal was ever filed.
We appointed a commissioner who conducted an evidentiary hearing at which defendant-appellant Merrell and his trial counsel both testified. The trial court found that trial counsel “was not retained to pursue an appeal of the court’s denial of a motion for post-conviction relief and therefore did not file such an appeal.” That being so, the petition for belated appeal is denied. See Steele v. Kehoe, 24 Fla. L. Weekly S237, S238-39, — So.2d -, -, 1999 WL 343071 (Fla. May 27, 1999).
Petition denied.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
736 So. 2d 730, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 7899, 1999 WL 391886, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/merrell-v-singletary-fladistctapp-1999.