Merrell v. New World Communications of St. Louis, Inc.

Missouri Court of Appeals

Merrell v. New World Communications of St. Louis, Inc.

103 S.W.3d 893, 2003 Mo. App. LEXIS 561, 2003 WL 1907876

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedApril 22, 2003

DocketNo. ED 81485

StatusPublished

This text of 103 S.W.3d 893 (Merrell v. New World Communications of St. Louis, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Merrell v. New World Communications of St. Louis, Inc., 103 S.W.3d 893, 2003 Mo. App. LEXIS 561, 2003 WL 1907876 (Mo. Ct. App. 2003).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Angilee Diamond Merrell, a minor, by and through Angie Lee Hudson, her natural mother and guardian, appeals from the trial court’s judgment granting the motion to dismiss her petition for lack of subject matter jurisdiction because jurisdiction of her claim was vested in the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal. We find no abuse of discretion. Collier v. Moore, 21 S.W.3d 858, 860 (Mo.App. E.D.2000). An extended opinion would have no prece-dential value. Judgment affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).¹

The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for the order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Angilee Diamond Merrell, a minor, by and through Angie Lee Hudson, her natural mother and guardian, appeals from the trial court’s judgment granting the motion to dismiss her petition for lack of subject matter jurisdiction because jurisdiction of her claim was vested in the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal. We find no abuse of discretion. Collier v. Moore, 21 S.W.3d 858, 860 (Mo.App. E.D.2000). An extended opinion would have no prece-dential value. Judgment affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).¹

The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for the order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

103 S.W.3d 893, 2003 Mo. App. LEXIS 561, 2003 WL 1907876, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/merrell-v-new-world-communications-of-st-louis-inc-moctapp-2003.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack