Mermelstein v. Kalker

294 A.D.2d 413, 741 N.Y.S.2d 903, 2002 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4893
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided May 13, 2002·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

—In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the defendants Santiago Texidor, Jr., and National Freight, Inc., appeal, as limited by their brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (I. Aronin, J.), dated September 4, 2001, as denied their motion to change the venue of the action from Kings County to Orange County.

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

Under the circumstances of this case, the Supreme Court providently exercised its discretion in denying the defendants’ motion to change venue based on the convenience of the material witnesses (see CPLR 510 [3]; O’Brien v Vassar Bros. Hosp., 207 AD2d 169). Altman, J.P., Smith, Krausman, McGinity and Cozier, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Mermelstein v. Kalker, 294 A.D.2d 413, 741 N.Y.S.2d 903, 2002 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4893 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2002).

294 A.D.2d 413 (Mermelstein v. Kalker) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Vieda v. Otro Rollo Tropical, Inc.
108 A.D.3d 695 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2013)
HANN, RICHARD v. BLACK, STEPHEN R.
96 A.D.3d 1503 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2012)
Cooke-Zwiebach v. Oziel
73 A.D.3d 427 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2010)