Mermelstein v. Glass
155 N.Y.S. 216
This text of 155 N.Y.S. 216 (Mermelstein v. Glass) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Mermelstein v. Glass, 155 N.Y.S. 216 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1915).
Opinion
Through an error in the charge the plaintiff was required to- prove facts which were not essential to her recovery. The error was in the defendant’s favor, and in no- way prejudiced his case. The cause of action alleged in the complaint was clearly proved, and the judgment should be affirmed, with costs.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
155 N.Y.S. 216, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mermelstein-v-glass-nyappterm-1915.