Merlite Industries, Inc. v. Maddalena

248 A.D.2d 117, 669 N.Y.S.2d 806, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1929

This text of 248 A.D.2d 117 (Merlite Industries, Inc. v. Maddalena) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Merlite Industries, Inc. v. Maddalena, 248 A.D.2d 117, 669 N.Y.S.2d 806, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1929 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1998).

Opinion

—Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Lorraine Miller, J.), entered September 3, 1997, which, to the extent appealed from as limited by [118]*118defendants’ brief, granted plaintiffs cross motion for sanctions and directed defendants’ counsel to pay $500 in costs and attorneys’ fees as a condition to opening defendants’ default, and to pay an additional $500 in sanctions to the Lawyers’ Fund for Client Protection, unanimously affirmed, with costs.

We find that the motion court properly exercised its discretion in awarding a $500 sanction against defendants’ counsel under the circumstances (see, 22 NYCKR 130-1.1 et seq.). The imposition of costs and attorneys’ fees of $500 payable to plaintiffs attorneys was a condition to the vacatur of defendants’ default and was clearly warranted (see, Gordineer v Gallagher, 160 AD2d 672; CPLR 2005, 3012 [d]; 5015 [a]). Concur — Sullivan, J. P., Rosenberger, Ellerin and Tom, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Gordineer v. Gallagher
160 A.D.2d 672 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1990)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
248 A.D.2d 117, 669 N.Y.S.2d 806, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1929, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/merlite-industries-inc-v-maddalena-nyappdiv-1998.