Merle Don Rothman, Trustee v. John F. Forbes & Co.
This text of 442 F.2d 1350 (Merle Don Rothman, Trustee v. John F. Forbes & Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
On review here are two items of accountants’ fees in the amounts of $2,-413.35 and $4,117.85 as allowed preferences in bankruptcy proceedings.
We find the allowance of the $2,413.35 was clearly erroneous, which appellee virtually concedes.
We cannot find the award of $4,117.85 was clearly erroneous.
Remanded for a modification consistent herewith.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
442 F.2d 1350, 1971 U.S. App. LEXIS 9857, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/merle-don-rothman-trustee-v-john-f-forbes-co-ca9-1971.