Merkel v. State

36 S.W.2d 1023, 1931 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 921
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas·Decided March 11, 1931·No. No. 14231·Published

Opinion

LATTIMORE, J.

Conviction for transporting intoxicating liquor; punishment, one year in the penitentiary.

We find in the record no bills of exception. We have carefully examined the facts. Appellant, in company with three other young people, drive quite a distance on a public .road. At some point on the journey he produced a bottle of whisky, of which each of the others partook. We have no doubt of the sufficiency of the testimony to support the judgment of conviction. It is expressly provided by our statute that a cotransporter of liquor is not an accomplice in such sense as that a conviction cannot be had upon his uncorroborated testimony. Each of the three young people in the car with appellant testified to his transportation of the liquor in question.

The judgment will be affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Merkel v. State, 36 S.W.2d 1023, 1931 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 921 (Tex. 1931).

36 S.W.2d 1023 (Merkel v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.