Merkel v. McDonald

Washington Supreme Court

Merkel v. McDonald

188 P. 915, 110 Wash. 700, 1920 Wash. LEXIS 576

CourtWashington Supreme Court

DecidedApril 7, 1920

DocketNo. 15553

StatusPublished

This text of 188 P. 915 (Merkel v. McDonald) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Washington Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Merkel v. McDonald, 188 P. 915, 110 Wash. 700, 1920 Wash. LEXIS 576 (Wash. 1920).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

This case presents substantially the facts presented in the case of Lumpp v. McDonald, ante p. 692, 188 Pac. 913. There was a verdict and judgment in favor of the respondent, Drumheller. The plaintiff appeals, assigning errors which, if well taken, would warrant a new trial. Both parties have, however, presented the question of the sufficiency of the facts. For the reasons stated in the case cited, we find the facts insufficient to sustain a judgment against the respondent.

The judgment will therefore stand affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

This case presents substantially the facts presented in the case of Lumpp v. McDonald, ante p. 692, 188 Pac. 913. There was a verdict and judgment in favor of the respondent, Drumheller. The plaintiff appeals, assigning errors which, if well taken, would warrant a new trial. Both parties have, however, presented the question of the sufficiency of the facts. For the reasons stated in the case cited, we find the facts insufficient to sustain a judgment against the respondent.

The judgment will therefore stand affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

188 P. 915, 110 Wash. 700, 1920 Wash. LEXIS 576, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/merkel-v-mcdonald-wash-1920.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack