Merkel v. McDonald

188 P. 915, 110 Wash. 700, 1920 Wash. LEXIS 576

Opinion

Per Curiam.

This case presents substantially the facts presented in the case of Lumpp v. McDonald, ante p. 692, 188 Pac. 913. There was a verdict and judgment in favor of the respondent, Drumheller. The plaintiff appeals, assigning errors which, if well taken, would warrant a new trial. Both parties have, however, presented the question of the sufficiency of the facts. For the reasons stated in the case cited, we find the facts insufficient to sustain a judgment against the respondent.

The judgment will therefore stand affirmed.