Merizzi v. Pipher

178 N.Y.S.3d 715, 2022 NY Slip Op 07395

Opinion

Merizzi v Pipher (2022 NY Slip Op 07395)

Merizzi v Pipher

2022 NY Slip Op 07395

Decided on December 23, 2022

Appellate Division, Fourth Department

Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.

This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.

Decided on December 23, 2022 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department
PRESENT: WHALEN, P.J., PERADOTTO, LINDLEY, BANNISTER, AND MONTOUR, JJ.

963 CA 22-00621

[*1]DANA M. MERIZZI AND MAUREEN A. RIESTER, PLAINTIFFS-RESPONDENTS,

v

RUTH PIPHER AND DENISE CORNWELL, AS TRUSTEE OF THE RUTH PIPHER FAMILY TRUST, DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS.

LYNN D'ELIA TEMES & STANCZYK, SYRACUSE (DAVID C. TEMES OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS.

MICHAELS & SMOLAK, P.C., AUBURN (MICHAEL G. BERSANI OF COUNSEL), FOR PLAINTIFFS-RESPONDENTS.

Appeal from an order and judgment (one paper) of the Supreme Court, Cayuga County (Thomas G. Leone, A.J.), entered December 9, 2020. The order and judgment granted in part the motion of plaintiffs for a default judgment.

Now, upon reading and filing the stipulation of discontinuance signed by the attorneys for the parties on July 14, 2022,

It is hereby ORDERED that said appeal is unanimously dismissed without costs upon stipulation.

Entered: December 23, 2022

Ann Dillon Flynn

Clerk of the Court