Meriweather v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Meriweather v. State

1920 OK CR 215, 192 P. 433, 18 Okla. Crim. 710, 1920 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 171

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

DecidedNovember 20, 1920

DocketNo. A-3616.

StatusPublished

This text of 1920 OK CR 215 (Meriweather v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Meriweather v. State, 1920 OK CR 215, 192 P. 433, 18 Okla. Crim. 710, 1920 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 171 (Okla. Ct. App. 1920).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This appeal is from a judgment rendered on a *711 verdict of a. jury finding the defendant guilty of shooting another with intent to do bodily harm, and fixing' his punishment at imprisonment in the county jail for a period of four months. The information in substance charges that in Oklahoma county, on the 6th day of September. 1918. defendant. Walter M. Meriweather, did' shoot one Arthur Wallace -with' a shotgun with intent to do great bodily harm. The evidence shows that the defendant shot a boy named Arthur Wn"iut-as alleged. The defense made was that the shooting was accidental. Counsel for plaintiff in error states in his brief that he has been unable to find error in the record sufficient to warrant a reversal of the cause. We have examined the record carefully and fail to find any error. The judgment appealed from herein is, therefore, affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

This appeal is from a judgment rendered on a *711 verdict of a. jury finding the defendant guilty of shooting another with intent to do bodily harm, and fixing' his punishment at imprisonment in the county jail for a period of four months. The information in substance charges that in Oklahoma county, on the 6th day of September. 1918. defendant. Walter M. Meriweather, did' shoot one Arthur Wallace -with' a shotgun with intent to do great bodily harm. The evidence shows that the defendant shot a boy named Arthur Wn"iut-as alleged. The defense made was that the shooting was accidental. Counsel for plaintiff in error states in his brief that he has been unable to find error in the record sufficient to warrant a reversal of the cause. We have examined the record carefully and fail to find any error. The judgment appealed from herein is, therefore, affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1920 OK CR 215, 192 P. 433, 18 Okla. Crim. 710, 1920 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 171, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/meriweather-v-state-oklacrimapp-1920.