Meritum Corp. v. Lawyers Title Insurance

440 N.E.2d 1338, 57 N.Y.2d 765, 454 N.Y.S.2d 991, 1982 N.Y. LEXIS 3685
New York Court of Appeals·Decided September 16, 1982·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

OPINION of the court

On review of submissions pursuant to rule 500.2 (b) of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.2 [g]), order affirmed, without costs. It cannot be said, as a matter of law, that the Appellate Division abused its discretion in dismissing the complaint pursuant to CPLR 327.

Concur: Chief Judge Cooke and Judges Jasen, Jones, Wachtler, Fuchsberg and Meyer. Taking no part: Judge Gabrielli.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Meritum Corp. v. Lawyers Title Insurance, 440 N.E.2d 1338, 57 N.Y.2d 765, 454 N.Y.S.2d 991, 1982 N.Y. LEXIS 3685 (N.Y. 1982).

440 N.E.2d 1338 (Meritum Corp. v. Lawyers Title Insurance) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

P.T. Delami Garment Industries v. di Torino
164 Misc. 2d 38 (New York Supreme Court, 1994)
Martin-Trigona v. Waaler & Evans
148 A.D.2d 361 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1989)