Meritor Transmission Corp. v. Eaton Corp.
This text of Meritor Transmission Corp. v. Eaton Corp. (Meritor Transmission Corp. v. Eaton Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.
United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
2007-1210, -1245
MERITOR TRANSMISSION CORPORATION,
Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
EATON CORPORATION,
Defendant-Cross Appellant.
Daniel R. Cherry, Welsh & Katz, LTD, of Chicago, Illinois, argued for plaintiff- appellant. With him on the brief were Walter J. Kawula, Jr., Brian J. Sodikoff and M..Lee Murrah, Chief Intellectual Property Counsel, ARVINMERITOR, INC., of Troy, Michigan.
John A. Burlingame and Donnie Lewis Kidd, Jr, Squire, Sanders & Dempsey L.L.P., of Washington, argued for defendant-cross appellant. With them on the brief was William H. Mandir, of Sughrue Mion PLLC, of Washington, DC.
Appealed from: United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina.
Judge Lacy H. Thornburg NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.
JUDGMENT
ON APPEAL from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina
In CASE NO(S). 1:04-CV-178
This CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is
ORDERED and ADJUDGED: AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36
Per Curiam (NEWMAN, MAYER, and GAJARSA, Circuit Judges).
ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT
DATED: December 13, 2007 / s / Jan Horbaly Jan Horbaly, Clerk
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Meritor Transmission Corp. v. Eaton Corp., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/meritor-transmission-corp-v-eaton-corp-cafc-2007.