Merit Oil Heating Corp. v. Morfesis

91 A.D.2d 604, 456 N.Y.S.2d 424, 1982 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 19449
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided December 6, 1982·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

— Appeal by defendant, as limited by his brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Beisheim, J.), dated September 21, 1981, as, upon vacating a default judgment taken against him, imposed costs as a condition of the vacatur. Order reversed insofar as appealed from, with $50 costs and disbursements, and the provision imposing costs is deleted. Litigants and their attorneys have a right to rely upon the observance of court rules which provide for the postponement of a trial based on the actual engagement of counsel in another court (see Rules of Practice, Supreme Court, Westchester County, 22 NYCRR 780.5 [a]; Bock v Bock, 132 App Div 921; 7 Carmody-Wait 2d, NY Prac, § 50:43). Hence, it was an abuse of discretion for the trial court to have imposed costs on the defendant as a condition for vacating the default caused by his attorney’s actual engagement at another trial (see New York Omnibus Corp. v Associated Transport, 76 NYS2d 602; Milton Holding Corp. v Gross, 193 NYS 75). Lazer, J. P., Mangano, Gibbons and Gulotta, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Merit Oil Heating Corp. v. Morfesis, 91 A.D.2d 604, 456 N.Y.S.2d 424, 1982 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 19449 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1982).

91 A.D.2d 604 (Merit Oil Heating Corp. v. Morfesis) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Mayo v. New York Telephone Co.
175 A.D.2d 390 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1991)
Rodriguez v. Westco Realty Co.
133 Misc. 2d 283 (Civil Court of the City of New York, 1986)