Merino v. Munoz

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Merino v. Munoz

71 N.Y.S. 321

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJuly 9, 1901

StatusPublished

This text of 71 N.Y.S. 321 (Merino v. Munoz) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Merino v. Munoz, 71 N.Y.S. 321 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1901).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We think that this order granting plaintiff’s motion for a commission to England to take testimony should be modified by requiring the plaintiff to stipulate that he will be present upon the trial for examination, or, if he is to remain in England, that his name be inserted in the commission as one of the parties to be examined there, so that the defendant may obtain the benefit of his examination, and of the production of such documents as he may have which are material and relevant to the issues.

Order modified accordingly, without costs. .

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

We think that this order granting plaintiff’s motion for a commission to England to take testimony should be modified by requiring the plaintiff to stipulate that he will be present upon the trial for examination, or, if he is to remain in England, that his name be inserted in the commission as one of the parties to be examined there, so that the defendant may obtain the benefit of his examination, and of the production of such documents as he may have which are material and relevant to the issues.

Order modified accordingly, without costs. .

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

71 N.Y.S. 321, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/merino-v-munoz-nyappdiv-1901.