Meridor v. State
This text of 193 So. 3d 81 (Meridor v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Affirmed. See State v. Sinclair, 995 So.2d 621 (Fla. 3d DCA 2008) (holding defendant was not entitled to seek relief [82]*82unless he “could establish the plea in the case under attack is the' only basis for deportation”) (quoting Forrest v. State, 988 So.2d 38, 40 (Fla. 4th DOA 2008) (emphasis in original)). See also Cano v. State, 112 So.3d 646 (Fla. 4th DCA2013) (holding that a defendant seeking to vacate his plea pursuant to Padilla v. Kentucky, 559 U.S. 356, 130 S.Ct. 1473, 176 L.Ed.2d 284 (2010), must establish that he was present in the country lawfully at the time of the plea and that the plea at issue is the sole basis for the defendant’s deportation).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
193 So. 3d 81, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 7165, 2016 WL 2743917, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/meridor-v-state-fladistctapp-2016.