Meridith v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Meridith v. State

165 S.E. 456, 45 Ga. App. 581, 1932 Ga. App. LEXIS 615

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedSeptember 1, 1932

Docket22391

StatusPublished

This text of 165 S.E. 456 (Meridith v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Meridith v. State, 165 S.E. 456, 45 Ga. App. 581, 1932 Ga. App. LEXIS 615 (Ga. Ct. App. 1932).

Pincite

Opinion

Luke, J.

The jury being the exclusive judges of the credibility of the witnesses, and one of the witnesses having sworn positively that the defendant sold and personally delivered to him a pint of whisky, and the trial judge having approved the verdict finding the defendant guilty of possessing whisky, this court can not reverse the judgment upon a motion for a new trial containing only the usual general grounds.

Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, O. J., and Hooper, J., conewr.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Luke, J.

The jury being the exclusive judges of the credibility of the witnesses, and one of the witnesses having sworn positively that the defendant sold and personally delivered to him a pint of whisky, and the trial judge having approved the verdict finding the defendant guilty of possessing whisky, this court can not reverse the judgment upon a motion for a new trial containing only the usual general grounds.

Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, O. J., and Hooper, J., conewr.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

165 S.E. 456, 45 Ga. App. 581, 1932 Ga. App. LEXIS 615, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/meridith-v-state-gactapp-1932.