Meridian Life Insurance Co. v. Lathem
This text of 95 S.E. 379 (Meridian Life Insurance Co. v. Lathem) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
When this ease was before the Supreme Court on exception to the direction of a verdict for the defendant (144 Ga. 227, 86 S. E. 1094),'that court reversed the judgment of the court below and held that “it was a question at issue as to whether the defendant, the in[809]*809sured, or his son, the agent, accepted the policy knowing the premium had been paid. If either the defendant or his agent, the son, accepted it, the defendant is bound for the amount of the premium.” The judgment of the Supreme Court having in effect held that the plaintiff was entitled to have his ease submitted to a jury, it was error to dismiss his petition, upon oral motion, for legal insufficiency.
Judgment reversed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
95 S.E. 379, 21 Ga. App. 808, 1918 Ga. App. LEXIS 537, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/meridian-life-insurance-co-v-lathem-gactapp-1918.