Meridian Land & Industrial Co. v. Ball

68 Miss. 135
CourtMississippi Supreme Court
DecidedOctober 15, 1890
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 68 Miss. 135 (Meridian Land & Industrial Co. v. Ball) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Mississippi Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Meridian Land & Industrial Co. v. Ball, 68 Miss. 135 (Mich. 1890).

Opinion

Campbell, J.,

delivered the opinion of the court.

A tenant continuing in possession after the expiration of his term cannot acquire title as against his landlord by the lapse of time, unless he has openly disclaimed tenancy to the knowledge of his landlord, as held in Holman v. Bonner, 63 Miss. 131; but that doctrine has no application to this case, for Bagsdale and Ball, the lessor and lessee, formally cancelled the lease, and thereby terminated the relation between them as landlord and tenant; and the evidence fully warrants the belief that thereafter Ball occupied and claimed as owner, and with the knowledge of Bagsdale, whose declarations on the subject were competent and satisfactory.

The verdict is manifestly right.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cosgrove v. Franklin
87 A. 544 (Supreme Court of Rhode Island, 1913)
Greenwood v. Moore
79 Miss. 201 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1901)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
68 Miss. 135, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/meridian-land-industrial-co-v-ball-miss-1890.