Meridian Capital Funding, Inc. v. Einhorn

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Meridian Capital Funding, Inc. v. Einhorn

226 A.D.2d 353, 640 N.Y.S.2d 767, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3353

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedApril 1, 1996

StatusPublished

This text of 226 A.D.2d 353 (Meridian Capital Funding, Inc. v. Einhorn) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Meridian Capital Funding, Inc. v. Einhorn, 226 A.D.2d 353, 640 N.Y.S.2d 767, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3353 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1996).

Pincite

Opinion

In an action to recover damages for unfair competition and for injunctive relief, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Shaw, J.), dated September 22, 1994, which denied its motion for a preliminary injunction barring the defendant Marc M. Einhorn from working in the "mortgage brokerage, origination, banking, financial, or corporate finance company” for two years, or from using the plaintiff’s "work product and trade secrets” including certain index cards which he wrote in his own hand.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The plaintiff failed to establish its entitlement to a preliminary injunction (see, Reed, Roberts Assocs. v Strauman, 40 NY2d 303; Cosmos Farms v American Computer Forms, 193 AD2d 577; Best Metro. Towel & Linen Supply Co.v A&P Coat, Apron & Linen Supply, 149 AD2d 642, 644). Rosenblatt, J. P., O’Brien, Ritter and Goldstein, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In an action to recover damages for unfair competition and for injunctive relief, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Shaw, J.), dated September 22, 1994, which denied its motion for a preliminary injunction barring the defendant Marc M. Einhorn from working in the "mortgage brokerage, origination, banking, financial, or corporate finance company” for two years, or from using the plaintiff’s "work product and trade secrets” including certain index cards which he wrote in his own hand.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The plaintiff failed to establish its entitlement to a preliminary injunction (see, Reed, Roberts Assocs. v Strauman, 40 NY2d 303; Cosmos Farms v American Computer Forms, 193 AD2d 577; Best Metro. Towel & Linen Supply Co.v A&P Coat, Apron & Linen Supply, 149 AD2d 642, 644). Rosenblatt, J. P., O’Brien, Ritter and Goldstein, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

226 A.D.2d 353, 640 N.Y.S.2d 767, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3353, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/meridian-capital-funding-inc-v-einhorn-nyappdiv-1996.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack