Merideth v. Amrine

122 P.2d 759, 155 Kan. 7, 1942 Kan. LEXIS 44
CourtSupreme Court of Kansas
DecidedMarch 2, 1942
DocketNo. 35,435
StatusPublished
Cited by5 cases

This text of 122 P.2d 759 (Merideth v. Amrine) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Kansas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Merideth v. Amrine, 122 P.2d 759, 155 Kan. 7, 1942 Kan. LEXIS 44 (kan 1942).

Opinion

Per Curiam:

This is an appeal from a judgment of the district court of Leavenworth county which denied the appellant a writ of habeas corpus and remanded him to the custody of the warden.

Recently appellant filed two motions in this court, the first prayed for an order requiring the warden to bring the appellant.personally before this court so that he might “offer further evidence of material proof ... in support of his cause.” Evidence is not received in this court which the trial court was not privileged to consider.

Appellant’s second motion was for the appointment of counsel. This motion necessitated an examination of the record presented in this appeal, and from it we find that on appellant’s arrest in Barton county he was represented by counsel, that on August 8, 1939, he pleaded guilty in open court as charged in an information duly filed against him charging him in two counts of the crime of forgery in the second degree and that he was duly sentenced to penal servitude therefor, for a term not yet expired.

In his petition for habeas corpus he first predicates his right thereto on the ground that hp was not guilty. That is not a basis for habeas corpus. Next, he alleged that he was coerced into making his plea of guilty. The trial court could not do. otherwise than find against appellant on that issue since no substantial evidence was offered in its support.

It therefore becomes perfectly clear that this appeal has no merit; consequently appellant’s motions are denied and his appeal is dismissed.

Hoch, J., not participating.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Hartman v. Edmondson
283 P.2d 397 (Supreme Court of Kansas, 1955)
Martin v. Edmondson
270 P.2d 791 (Supreme Court of Kansas, 1954)
Paul v. Waters
109 F. Supp. 195 (E.D. Oklahoma, 1952)
Fisher v. Fraser
233 P.2d 1066 (Supreme Court of Kansas, 1951)
Downs v. Hudspeth
178 P.2d 219 (Supreme Court of Kansas, 1947)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
122 P.2d 759, 155 Kan. 7, 1942 Kan. LEXIS 44, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/merideth-v-amrine-kan-1942.