Mergenhagen v. Mergenhagen
This text of 23 A.D.2d 525 (Mergenhagen v. Mergenhagen) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Judgment affirmed, without costs of this appeal to either party. All concur, except Bastow and Goldman, JJ., who dissent and vote to reverse and to grant a new trial, in the following memorandum: The verdict is contrary to the evidence whether based on a finding of contributory negligence on the part of plaintiff or absence of negligence on the part of defendant. (Appeal from judgment of Erie Trial Term in favor of defendant in an automobile negligence action; also appeal from order denying motion for a new trial.) Present — Williams, P. J., Bastow, Goldman, Henry and Del Veeehio, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
23 A.D.2d 525, 255 N.Y.S.2d 820, 1965 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5100, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mergenhagen-v-mergenhagen-nyappdiv-1965.