Mergen v. City & County of Denver

46 Colo. 385
Supreme Court of Colorado·Decided September 15, 1909·No. No. 6742·Published·Cited by 8 cases

Opinion

Mr. Justice Musser

delivered the opinion of the court:

Plaintiff in error was convicted of violating sec. 1256 of the Municipal Code of the city and county of Denver. The section is as follows: “It shall be unlawful for any person, firm or corporation to keep open or conduct any butcher shop, meat market or grocery store, or to expose or offer for sale, or sell any meats, fish, game, poultry, groceries or provisions on the first day of the week, commonly called Sunday.”

It does not appear that the section, as framed, will promote the peace, welfare, health or other ends for the promotion of which the police power of the city may be exercised. Upon the authority of Denver v. Bach, 26 Colo. 530, and for the reasons there given the section of the Municipal Code under which plaintiff in error was convicted, is invalid.

The judgment will, therefore, be reversed and the cause remanded with instructions to dismiss the complaint. Reversed and remanded.

Decision en banc.

All the justices concurring.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Mergen v. City & County of Denver, 46 Colo. 385 (Colo. 1909).

46 Colo. 385 (Mergen v. City & County of Denver) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

County of Spokane v. Valu-Mart, Inc.
419 P.2d 993 (Washington Supreme Court, 1966)
Mosko v. Dunbar
309 P.2d 581 (Supreme Court of Colorado, 1957)
Rosenbaum v. City & County of Denver
81 P.2d 760 (Supreme Court of Colorado, 1938)
Allen v. City of Colorado Springs
75 P.2d 141 (Supreme Court of Colorado, 1937)