Merfish Holdings, Ltd., Jacobson Holdings, Ltd., and RMG Properties v. VisteelI., Ltd. Tex-Tube Co. & TT Investment Co.

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedMay 9, 2002
Docket01-02-00062-CV
StatusPublished

This text of Merfish Holdings, Ltd., Jacobson Holdings, Ltd., and RMG Properties v. VisteelI., Ltd. Tex-Tube Co. & TT Investment Co. (Merfish Holdings, Ltd., Jacobson Holdings, Ltd., and RMG Properties v. VisteelI., Ltd. Tex-Tube Co. & TT Investment Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Merfish Holdings, Ltd., Jacobson Holdings, Ltd., and RMG Properties v. VisteelI., Ltd. Tex-Tube Co. & TT Investment Co., (Tex. Ct. App. 2002).

Opinion



Opinion issued May 9, 2002





In The

Court of Appeals

For The

First District of Texas



NO. 01-02-00062-CV

____________



MERFISH HOLDINGS, LTD., JACOBSON HOLDINGS, LTD.,

AND RMG PROPERTIES, INC., Appellants



V.



VISTEEL I, LTD., TEX-TUBE COMPANY,

AND TT INVESTMENT COMPANY, Appellees



On Appeal from the 113th District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 2001-56968



O P I N I O N

In this accelerated case, appellants, Merfish Holdings, Ltd., Jacobson Holdings, Ltd., and RMG Properties, Inc. (collectively "the Merfish Group"), challenge the trial court's December 17, 2001 order denying their motion to stay the proceeding and compel arbitration between them and appellees, ViSteel I, Ltd., Tex-Tube Company, and TT Investment Company (collectively "the ViSteel Group").

The arbitration clauses at issue are contained in two joint venture agreements entered into in 1994. All parties agree that the business of the joint ventures involved interstate commerce. The Federal Arbitration Act applies to all suits in state and federal court when the dispute concerns a "contract evidencing a transaction involving commerce." Jack B. Anglin Co. v. Tipps, 842 S.W.2d 266, 269-70 (Tex. 1992) (orig. proceeding).

Mandamus, not interlocutory appeal, is the proper means for reviewing an order denying arbitration under the Federal Arbitration Act. Cantella & Co., Inc. v. Goodwin, 924 S.W.2d 943, 945 (Tex. 1996) (orig. proceeding); Anglin, 842 S.W.2d at 272. Thus, we have no jurisdiction to consider this interlocutory appeal, and we must dismiss it for want of jurisdiction. See Belmont Constructors, Inc. v. Lyondell Petrochemical Co., 896 S.W.2d 352, 356 (Tex. App.--Houston [1st Dist.] 1995, no writ).



Conclusion

We dismiss the Merfish Group's interlocutory appeal of the trial court's December 17, 2001 order for want of jurisdiction. (1)



Frank C. Price

Justice



Panel consists of Justices Nuchia, Radack, and Price. (2)

Do not publish. Tex. R. App. P. 47.

1.

In a parallel proceeding, the Merfish Group has also filed a petition for writ of mandamus challenging the trial court's December 17, 2001 order. We address the merits of the Merfish Group's claims in that proceeding. In re Merfish Holdings, Ltd., Jacobson Holdings, Ltd., and RMG Properties, Inc., 01-02-00062-CV, 2002 WL _____ (Tex. App.--Houston [1st Dist.] May 9, 2002, no pet. h.).

2.

The Honorable Frank C. Price, former Justice, Court of Appeals, First District of Texas at Houston, participating by assignment.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Jack B. Anglin Co., Inc. v. Tipps
842 S.W.2d 266 (Texas Supreme Court, 1992)
Cantella & Co., Inc. v. Goodwin
924 S.W.2d 943 (Texas Supreme Court, 1996)
Belmont Constructors, Inc. v. Lyondell Petrochemical Co.
896 S.W.2d 352 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1995)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Merfish Holdings, Ltd., Jacobson Holdings, Ltd., and RMG Properties v. VisteelI., Ltd. Tex-Tube Co. & TT Investment Co., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/merfish-holdings-ltd-jacobson-holdings-ltd-and-rmg-texapp-2002.