Meretzky v. Westchester Trust Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Meretzky v. Westchester Trust Co.

237 A.D. 826

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedDecember 15, 1932

StatusPublished

This text of 237 A.D. 826 (Meretzky v. Westchester Trust Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Meretzky v. Westchester Trust Co., 237 A.D. 826 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1932).

Pincite

Opinion

As to defendant Westchester Trust Company, judgment and order reversed on the law and the facts and a new trial granted, with costs to abide the event, on the ground that prejudicial errors occurring on the trial and in the charge prevented the presentation of a clear question of fact for the jury to determine; and on the further ground that the verdict is against the weight of the evidence. Lazansky, P. J., Kapper, Seudder, Tompkins and Davis, JJ., concur. As to defendant Wolff, judgment and order reversed on the law and the facts and a new trial granted, costs to abide the event, on the first ground for reversal stated as to defendant Westchester Trust Company. Lazansky, P. J., Kapper and Davis, JJ., concur; Seudder and Tompkins, JJ., vote for reversal of the judgment and order and a reinstatement of the verdict.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

As to defendant Westchester Trust Company, judgment and order reversed on the law and the facts and a new trial granted, with costs to abide the event, on the ground that prejudicial errors occurring on the trial and in the charge prevented the presentation of a clear question of fact for the jury to determine; and on the further ground that the verdict is against the weight of the evidence. Lazansky, P. J., Kapper, Seudder, Tompkins and Davis, JJ., concur. As to defendant Wolff, judgment and order reversed on the law and the facts and a new trial granted, costs to abide the event, on the first ground for reversal stated as to defendant Westchester Trust Company. Lazansky, P. J., Kapper and Davis, JJ., concur; Seudder and Tompkins, JJ., vote for reversal of the judgment and order and a reinstatement of the verdict.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

237 A.D. 826, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/meretzky-v-westchester-trust-co-nyappdiv-1932.