Meres v. Simmons

170 So. 716, 126 Fla. 178
CourtSupreme Court of Florida
DecidedNovember 18, 1936
StatusPublished

This text of 170 So. 716 (Meres v. Simmons) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Meres v. Simmons, 170 So. 716, 126 Fla. 178 (Fla. 1936).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

This appeal is from a decree refusing to dismiss an amended bill of complaint by appellees as trustees to foreclose a trust deed. The ground of dismissal being that the amendment constituted a departure in pleading. In the order appealed from the court in terms withheld ruling on other questions.

The amendment to the bill of complaint had to do with an acceleration agreement entered into between the parties to the mortgage. The original bill had equity and had been answered when the amendment was filed. The motion to dismiss should -have been directed to the amendment. We do not think the amendment constituted a departure in pleading. It involved an agreement entered into between the parties pertaining to the main contract and in no way affects the latter except as to payments. The ultimate purpose of the suit is not changed. Johnston v. Johnston, 122 Fla. 372, 165 So. 698.

The judgment below is accordingly affirmed.

Affirmed.

Ellis, P. J., and Terrell and Buford, J. J., concur. Whitfield, C. J., and Brown and Davis, J. J., concur in the opinion and judgment.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Johnston, Et Ux. v. Johnston
165 So. 698 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1936)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
170 So. 716, 126 Fla. 178, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/meres-v-simmons-fla-1936.