Meres v. Clayton
120 So. 766, 97 Fla. 329
Opinion
In a mortgage foreclosure the defense was payment and the bill of complaint was dismissed. Complainant appealed. Payment being an affirmative defense it should be shown by a clear preponderance of the evidence. 42 C. J. 117, Section 1677.
As to payment of the entire debt the evidence is indefinite, and the decree is reversed and the cause remanded for appropriate proceedings.
It is so ordered.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Meres v. Clayton, 120 So. 766, 97 Fla. 329 (Fla. 1929).
120 So. 766 (Meres v. Clayton) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Wiggins v. Morrison
242 So. 2d 184 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1970)
Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co. v. Smith
184 So. 513 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1938)