Merenda v. Lisi

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Merenda v. Lisi

244 A.D.2d 535, 664 N.Y.S.2d 471, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11860

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedNovember 24, 1997

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 244 A.D.2d 535 (Merenda v. Lisi) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Merenda v. Lisi, 244 A.D.2d 535, 664 N.Y.S.2d 471, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11860 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1997).

Pincite

Opinion

—In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the defendants appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Lally, J.), dated May 1, 1996, which denied their motion for a protective order and to quash a subpoena served upon a nonparty witness.

Ordered that the appeal is dismissed as academic, with costs.

The defendants’ motion sought, in effect, to prevent the taking of a second deposition of a nonparty witness. Inasmuch as a stay was not obtained, and the second deposition has since taken place, the appeal is dismissed as academic (see, People ex rel. Smalls v Tekben, 193 AD2d 828; Matter of Niagara Mohawk Power Corp. v New York State Dept, of Envtl. Conservation, 169 AD2d 943). Bracken, J. P., Pizzuto, Altman and Krausman, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the defendants appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Lally, J.), dated May 1, 1996, which denied their motion for a protective order and to quash a subpoena served upon a nonparty witness.

Ordered that the appeal is dismissed as academic, with costs.

The defendants’ motion sought, in effect, to prevent the taking of a second deposition of a nonparty witness. Inasmuch as a stay was not obtained, and the second deposition has since taken place, the appeal is dismissed as academic (see, People ex rel. Smalls v Tekben, 193 AD2d 828; Matter of Niagara Mohawk Power Corp. v New York State Dept, of Envtl. Conservation, 169 AD2d 943). Bracken, J. P., Pizzuto, Altman and Krausman, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

244 A.D.2d 535, 664 N.Y.S.2d 471, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11860, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/merenda-v-lisi-nyappdiv-1997.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack