Meredith Village Savings Bank v. Marshall
This text of 44 A. 526 (Meredith Village Savings Bank v. Marshall) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Hampshire primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The transfer by Crippen of his shares of stock in the Farmers’ National Bank to the plaintiffs as a pledge to secure the indebtedness of Crippen, Lawrence & Co., was valid as between the parties, although without registration on the books of the Farmers’ National Bank, and without the knowledge of the officers of that bank. It passed Crippen’s legal and equitable title to the shares of stock to the plaintiffs. Scripture v. Soapstone Co., 50 N. H. 571, 585; Buttrick v. Railroad, 62. N. H. 413; P. S., c. 149, s. 14. As Crippen’s administrator had no greater rights than he had, the question of the rights of third! parties without notice is not presented.
The only question is whether the pledgee of stock is entitled! to the dividends which accrue while he holds it as against the pledgor, and whether the pledgee can recover them of the. pledgor when they are paid to him by reason of the want of a transfer on the books of the corporation. Under the contract of pledge, the pledgee is entitled to hold the natural increase of the-, thing pledged as accessory, or as an incident of the property in his hands. The general rule that the increase of the property is. pledged with it, applies to dividends accruing on stock while it *418 is held in-pledge and gives them to the pledgee. The fact that there was no registration of the transfer on the books of the bank warranted that corporation in paying the dividends to the pledgor. But the dividends being the property of the pledgee under the contract, when the pledgor receives them he holds them as the trustee of the pledgee, and is answerable for them to the pledgee in a suit for their recovery. Jones Pledges, s. 398; Sch. Bailm., s. 176; 1 Cook Stock & Stockh., s. 468; Merchants Bank v. Richards, 6 Mo. App. 454; Gaty v. Holliday, 8 Mo. App. 118; Hill v. Company, 8 Hun 459; Herman v. Maxwell, 47 N. Y. Super. Ct. 347.
Judgment for the plaintiffs.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
44 A. 526, 68 N.H. 417, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/meredith-village-savings-bank-v-marshall-nh-1895.