Meredith v. Sharp
259 S.W.2d 172, 152 Tex. 437, 1953 Tex. LEXIS 464
Opinion
Under our view petitioner has no interest, financially or otherwise, which would authorize him to maintain this suit. Yett v. Cook, 115 Tex. 205, 281 S. W. 837. The trial court should therefore have dismissed the suit rather than deny the writ, but since the practical effect of the two orders is the same, no purpose would be served in granting the writ to reform the judgment. The application is therefore stamped Refused. No Reversible Error.
Opinion delivered June 24, 1953.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Meredith v. Sharp, 259 S.W.2d 172, 152 Tex. 437, 1953 Tex. LEXIS 464 (Tex. 1953).
259 S.W.2d 172 (Meredith v. Sharp) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Concerned Citizens for Equality v. McDonald
863 F. Supp. 393 (E.D. Texas, 1994)
McCraw v. Vickers
717 S.W.2d 738 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1986)
Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion
Texas Attorney General Reports, 1984
Opinion No.
Texas Attorney General Reports, 1984
Eddowes v. Curry
599 S.W.2d 367 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1980)
Eikel v. Burton
530 S.W.2d 907 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1975)
Grant v. Ammerman
451 S.W.2d 777 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1970)
Avery v. Midland County
406 S.W.2d 422 (Texas Supreme Court, 1966)
Holland v. Taylor
270 S.W.2d 219 (Texas Supreme Court, 1954)