Meredith v. New Jersey Zinc & Iron Co.
56 N.J. Eq. 454
This text of 56 N.J. Eq. 454 (Meredith v. New Jersey Zinc & Iron Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Meredith v. New Jersey Zinc & Iron Co., 56 N.J. Eq. 454 (N.J. 1897).
Opinion
Decree affirmed, for the reasons given in the court of chancery.
For affirmance — The Chief-Justice, Collins, Garrison, Gummere, Ludlow, Van Syckel, Adams, Bogert, Nixon —9.
For reversal — Depue, Dixon, Lippincott, Nixon — 4.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Hodge v. the Cuba Co.
60 A.2d 88 (New Jersey Court of Chancery, 1948)
Mueller v. Kraeuter Co., Inc.
25 A.2d 874 (New Jersey Court of Chancery, 1942)
Gen. Invest. Co. v. Amer. Hide Leather Co.
127 A. 529 (New Jersey Court of Chancery, 1925)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
56 N.J. Eq. 454, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/meredith-v-new-jersey-zinc-iron-co-nj-1897.