Meredith v. New Jersey Zinc & Iron Co.
56 N.J. Eq. 454
Opinion
Decree affirmed, for the reasons given in the court of chancery.
For affirmance — The Chief-Justice, Collins, Garrison, Gummere, Ludlow, Van Syckel, Adams, Bogert, Nixon —9.
For reversal — Depue, Dixon, Lippincott, Nixon — 4.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Meredith v. New Jersey Zinc & Iron Co., 56 N.J. Eq. 454 (N.J. 1897).
56 N.J. Eq. 454 (Meredith v. New Jersey Zinc & Iron Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Hodge v. the Cuba Co.
60 A.2d 88 (New Jersey Court of Chancery, 1948)
Mueller v. Kraeuter Co., Inc.
25 A.2d 874 (New Jersey Court of Chancery, 1942)
Gen. Invest. Co. v. Amer. Hide Leather Co.
127 A. 529 (New Jersey Court of Chancery, 1925)