Meredith v. National Archives and Records Administration

Missouri Court of Appeals

Meredith v. National Archives and Records Administration

198 S.W.3d 198, 2006 Mo. App. LEXIS 1225, 2006 WL 2347497

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedAugust 15, 2006

DocketED 87382

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 198 S.W.3d 198 (Meredith v. National Archives and Records Administration) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Meredith v. National Archives and Records Administration, 198 S.W.3d 198, 2006 Mo. App. LEXIS 1225, 2006 WL 2347497 (Mo. Ct. App. 2006).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

The claimant, Jay Meredith, appeals from the decision of the Labor Industrial Relations Commission affirming and adopting the decision of the Appeals Tribunal, which found that the claimant was discharged for misconduct connected with his work and was therefore disqualified for unemployment-compensation benefits. We have reviewed the parties’ briefs and the record on appeal. The decision of the Commission is supported by competent and substantial evidence on the whole record. An opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value. The parties, however, have been furnished with a memorandum, for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order. The Commission’s decision is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b)(4).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

The claimant, Jay Meredith, appeals from the decision of the Labor Industrial Relations Commission affirming and adopting the decision of the Appeals Tribunal, which found that the claimant was discharged for misconduct connected with his work and was therefore disqualified for unemployment-compensation benefits. We have reviewed the parties’ briefs and the record on appeal. The decision of the Commission is supported by competent and substantial evidence on the whole record. An opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value. The parties, however, have been furnished with a memorandum, for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order. The Commission’s decision is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b)(4).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

198 S.W.3d 198, 2006 Mo. App. LEXIS 1225, 2006 WL 2347497, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/meredith-v-national-archives-and-records-administration-moctapp-2006.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack