Meredith v. National Archives and Records Administration

198 S.W.3d 198, 2006 Mo. App. LEXIS 1225, 2006 WL 2347497
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided August 15, 2006·No. ED 87382·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

The claimant, Jay Meredith, appeals from the decision of the Labor Industrial Relations Commission affirming and adopting the decision of the Appeals Tribunal, which found that the claimant was discharged for misconduct connected with his work and was therefore disqualified for unemployment-compensation benefits. We have reviewed the parties’ briefs and the record on appeal. The decision of the Commission is supported by competent and substantial evidence on the whole record. An opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value. The parties, however, have been furnished with a memorandum, for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order. The Commission’s decision is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b)(4).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Meredith v. National Archives and Records Administration, 198 S.W.3d 198, 2006 Mo. App. LEXIS 1225, 2006 WL 2347497 (Mo. Ct. App. 2006).

198 S.W.3d 198 (Meredith v. National Archives and Records Administration) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Gwendolyn H. King v. Bank of America, N.A.
Court of Appeals of Tennessee, 2020