Home/Superior Court of North Carolina/Meredith v. . Kent's

Meredith v. . Kent's

1 N.C. 52
Superior Court of North Carolina·Decided October 5, 1792·Published

Opinion

Objected by Lowther, for the plaintiff, who opposed the introduction of the testimony totis viribus, upon the ground that this was not the best evidence; as the witness might have been and was actually summoned in the cause, whilst in the State. Cited: Kinzey v. King, 28 N.C. 78; Stern v. Herren, 101 N.C. 519;State v. Means, 175 N.C. 823. *Page 58

(53)

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Meredith v. . Kent's, 1 N.C. 52 (N.C. Ct. App. 1792).

1 N.C. 52 (Meredith v. . Kent's) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Stern & Co. v. Herren
8 S.E. 221 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1888)