Home/Superior Court of North Carolina/Meredith v. . Kent's

Meredith v. . Kent's

1 N.C. 52
CourtSuperior Court of North Carolina
DecidedOctober 5, 1792
StatusPublished

This text of 1 N.C. 52 (Meredith v. . Kent's) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Superior Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Meredith v. . Kent's, 1 N.C. 52 (N.C. Ct. App. 1792).

Opinion

Objected by Lowther, for the plaintiff, who opposed the introduction of the testimony totis viribus, upon the ground that this was not the best evidence; as the witness might have been and was actually summoned in the cause, whilst in the State. Cited: Kinzey v. King, 28 N.C. 78; Stern v. Herren, 101 N.C. 519;State v. Means, 175 N.C. 823. *Page 58

(53)

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Stern & Co. v. Herren
8 S.E. 221 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1888)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
1 N.C. 52, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/meredith-v-kents-ncsuperct-1792.