Meredith v. Board of Supervisors
50 Cal. 433
Opinion
For the reason given by the judge of the court below in denying the motion for a new trial, the judgment and order denying a new trial are affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Meredith v. Board of Supervisors, 50 Cal. 433 (Cal. 1875).
50 Cal. 433 (Meredith v. Board of Supervisors) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Hallinan v. Mellon
218 Cal. App. 2d 342 (California Court of Appeal, 1963)
Stout v. Democratic County Central Committee
251 P.2d 321 (California Supreme Court, 1952)
Klose v. Superior Court
217 P.2d 97 (California Court of Appeal, 1950)
Brown v. Dwyer
146 P. 1047 (California Court of Appeal, 1915)
Black v. Board of Police Commissioners
119 P. 674 (California Court of Appeal, 1911)
Potomac Oil Co. v. Dye
102 P. 677 (California Court of Appeal, 1909)
Ransom v. City of Boston
78 N.E. 481 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1906)
Kline v. McKelvey
49 S.E. 896 (West Virginia Supreme Court, 1905)
City Council of Cripple Creek v. People ex rel. Ferguson
19 Colo. App. 399 (Colorado Court of Appeals, 1904)
People ex rel. Morgan v. Hayne
7 L.R.A. 348 (California Supreme Court, 1890)
Kennedy v. Board of Education
22 P. 1042 (California Supreme Court, 1890)
Biggs v. McBride
5 L.R.A. 115 (Oregon Supreme Court, 1889)
French v. Cowan
10 A. 335 (Supreme Judicial Court of Maine, 1887)
Clark v. His Creditors
57 Cal. 639 (California Supreme Court, 1881)